Layered thinking, also called hierarchical or multi-step reasoning, refers to the ability to decompose problems into multiple levels of abstraction, process information sequentially, and integrate insights across different layers of complexity. Layered thinking—supported by decades of scientific research—provides a structured pathway for effective learning and problem solving. It matters because it not only improves comprehension and retention but also fosters the development of critical and creative skills across diverse educational and professional settings.
Layered Thinking Models
Layered thinking models are frameworks that describe how cognitive processes or learning outcomes are organized in levels, with each level building upon the previous one. Here are a few prominent models:
Bloom’s Taxonomy (Original and Revised):
Original Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956)
Developed by Benjamin Bloom and colleagues, this model organized cognitive skills into six levels—from simple recall (Knowledge) to higher-order skills like Synthesis and Evaluation. Developed by Benjamin Bloom and colleagues in 1956, the original taxonomy was a framework for classifying educational objectives. It broke down cognitive skills into six levels:
- Knowledge – Recall of facts and basic concepts
- Comprehension – Understanding the meaning of information
- Application – Using information in new situations
- Analysis – Breaking information into parts to explore relationships
- Synthesis – Combining parts to form a new whole
- Evaluation – Making judgments based on criteria
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (2001)
Updated by Anderson and Krathwohl, this version uses action verbs (Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create) and adds a second dimension—the Knowledge Dimension (factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive). This hierarchical structure is widely used and extensively supported by educational research.
SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome):
This model, developed by Biggs and Collis, categorizes learning outcomes into five levels (pre-structural, uni-structural, multi-structural, relational, and extended abstract). It focuses on the quality of understanding and how students integrate knowledge, and is particularly valued for its ability to differentiate between superficial and deep learning.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Rather than simply categorizing cognitive skills by type, DOK organizes tasks based on the complexity of thinking required—from basic recall to extended strategic thinking. It’s often used in conjunction with Bloom’s to design assessments and learning experiences that progressively demand more complex thinking.
Which Model Is Best Supported by Scholars?
While all these models have scholarly support, Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy is the most widely recognized and frequently used across various educational settings. Its clear, hierarchical structure provides a practical roadmap for designing instruction and assessments. Research has consistently shown that using Bloom’s levels to scaffold learning—from basic knowledge to creative production—enhances both comprehension and critical thinking skills.
For example, studies have validated the use of Bloom’s framework in:
- Scaffolding Learning: Vygotsky’s ideas on scaffolding align well with Bloom’s hierarchy, supporting the progression from lower-order to higher-order thinking skills.
- Improving Assessment: Numerous educators and researchers have found that aligning assessments with Bloom’s levels improves clarity in measuring student progress and outcomes.
In summary, while models like SOLO and Webb’s DOK offer valuable perspectives—especially when a focus on the depth or complexity of learning is required—Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy remains the most robust, widely supported, and actionable layered thinking model for educators, STEM teachers, self-learners, and hobbyists.
Actionable Tip
When designing lessons or projects, start by identifying the foundational knowledge (Remember and Understand) that learners need. Then, progressively incorporate activities that challenge them to Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and finally Create—ensuring that each new layer builds on and deepens understanding of the previous one.
Can LLMs Perform Layered Thinking?
LLMs can perform a simulated form of layered thinking using techniques like Chain-of-Thought (COT), Self-reflection, and Tree-of-Thoughts (TOT), allowing them to handle hierarchical tasks to some extent. However, this is based on pattern recognition rather than genuine understanding, and they face limitations such as brittleness, inefficiency, and lack of adaptability compared to human cognition. While they approximate layered thinking effectively in structured scenarios, their approach remains fundamentally distinct from the intuitive, comprehension-driven process of humans.
Our STEM Educational Designed Activities
Feel free to contact us for a comprehensive, actionable plan for educators, rooted in cognitive science and real-world STEM applications, ensuring students actively develop hierarchical reasoning skills.